750 North 40th Street , Phoenix, AZ 85008
Oasis Hospital Home
Call
379058C5-BD0D-42F4-B7B1-E2D1179556D2 Pay Your Bill

Understanding Your Options: Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement vs. Traditional Surgery

Understanding Your Options: Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement vs. Traditional Surgery

Tue Oct 22 2024
Knee replacement is a surgical solution for some patients with severe knee pain due to arthritis or injury. With advancements in medical technology, patients now have more options when considering knee replacement procedures. One of the most significant innovations in this field is Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement.

Traditional Knee Replacement Surgery

Traditional knee replacement surgery, or conventional knee replacement, involves the surgeon manually removing the damaged bone and cartilage from the knee joint and replacing it with an artificial implant. This procedure has been performed for decades and is considered a standard approach for treating severe knee arthritis or injury.

Benefits of Traditional Knee Replacement:

  • Proven Track Record: Traditional knee replacement has a long history of success, with many patients experiencing pain relief and improved mobility.
  • Widely Available: Most orthopedic surgeons have the training to perform traditional knee replacement surgery, ensuring it remains a widely accessible option for patients.
  • Suitable for Various Conditions: Traditional surgery can be effective for patients with severe arthritis affecting multiple parts of the knee.

Considerations:

  • Manual Precision: The success of the surgery largely depends on the surgeon's experience and skill.
  • Recovery Time: Recovery from traditional knee replacement surgery can take several months, and patients may experience significant postoperative pain and require extensive rehabilitation.

Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement

Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement is a recent advancement that utilizes robotic technology to assist the surgeon during the procedure. This approach starts by taking a knee CT scan to create a 3D model of the patient's anatomy. The surgeon uses this model to plan the surgery with higher precision, determining the optimal placement and alignment of the implant.

Benefits of Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement:

  • Enhanced Precision: The Mako system allows for more precise removal of damaged tissue and placement of the implant, which can improve the knee's overall alignment and balance. A study published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery demonstrated that robotic-assisted knee replacement, such as with the Mako system, provides superior implant positioning and alignment compared to traditional methods. The study found that the enhanced precision achieved with robotic assistance reduces the risk of implant misalignment, contributing to better functional outcomes and potentially increasing the implant's longevity. (Roe et al., 2019).
  • Personalized Surgical Plan: The 3D model provides a detailed view of the patient's unique knee anatomy, allowing the surgeon to create a personalized surgical plan tailored to the patient's specific needs.
  • Potentially Faster Recovery: Due to the procedure's enhanced precision and minimally invasive nature, some patients may experience a faster recovery and less postoperative pain than traditional surgery.

Considerations:

  • Availability: Mako Robotic-Assisted Surgery is available at Arizona Specialty Hospital but may not be available at all hospitals or surgical centers.

Comparing the Two Approaches: What to Expect

When considering knee replacement surgery, patients need to understand the differences between traditional and Mako Robotic-Assisted approaches:
  • Surgical Technique: Traditional surgery relies more on the surgeon's manual skill and experience, while the Mako system provides robotic assistance for enhanced precision.
  • Recovery Experience: Patients undergoing Mako Robotic-Assisted Surgery may have a different recovery experience, which may help eliminate pain and a quicker return to daily activities. However, individual recovery can vary based on various factors, including the patient's overall health and adherence to rehabilitation protocols.
  • Outcome Expectations: Both approaches aim to relieve pain and improve knee function. The choice between traditional and robotic-assisted surgery should be based on a thorough discussion with a healthcare provider, considering the patient's specific condition, preferences, and goals.

The Bottom Line

Choosing between Mako Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement and traditional surgery involves weighing each approach's potential benefits and limitations. While Mako offers advanced precision and may lead to a faster recovery, traditional knee replacement remains a reliable option with a proven track record. Patients are encouraged to consult with their orthopedic surgeon to explore their options and determine the best surgical plan for their needs. Individual results depend on various factors, such as overall health, adherence to rehabilitation protocols, and the complexity of the knee condition. Patients must consult their healthcare providers to determine which option best suits their condition.

For more information on knee replacement options or to schedule a consultation, please contact one of the Orthopedic Surgeons at Arizona Specialty Hospital today.

Sources: